Were Senate Ethics Rules made for breaking?

Posted by David All
Mon, 2007-08-06 19:29

Michelle Malkin is following the story of how Democratic Senator Dick Durbin allegedly violated Senate ethics Rules by using Senate resources to create a plea to YearlyKos activists:

Earlier today, bloggers Reverse Spin and Backyard Conservative called attention to Democrat Dick Durbin’s video to the nutroots YearlyKos convention, which used an official Senate seal. The Senate Ethics Manual explicitly forbids the use of the Senate seal for campaign use. The video had been posted on the DailyKos website since Saturday. (Keep reading Michelle's post.)

And last month, TechRepublican pointed out similar violations of the rules by Harry Reid.

Are these Senate Ethics Rules just for show? Who is enforcing them? Does it matter to those that they represent?

Personally, I don't think a U.S. Senator or a Member of the House -- Republican or Democrat -- should have their web-use governed by a silly, prehistoric ethics manual. We live in the modern world and it's time our public officials start communicating like it.

Videos, blogs, social networking, etc. These are all likely vehicles for "Rule" breaking. But they're also modes of effectively communicating in the modern world.

In June I wrote an op-ed with Paul Blumenthal on Members of Congress being restricted by House Franking Rules.

Now it looks like we need to write one for the U.S. Senate. If not, we'll just be writing another post about how Senator X violated the Rules, again, by trying to communicate a message more effectively.

Comments

Screw the Rules?!?!

Excuse me, but it sounded like you were saying you're all for rule breaking!?!?! Maybe the rules aren't great and we should change them, but flagrent violations of the ethics as they stand should not be tolerated! If no one is in change of enforcing a rule, then someone should be delegated or the rule abrogated. What's going on here? Are you saying we should just do whatever we can get away with?

I'm saying...

...That the rules need to be updated and modernized tremendously. That likely means tossing almost all restrictions overboard.

You might be surprised to learn that not a single constituent has ever filed a complaint against their Member of Congress for the Members' use of the Internet or email (except when Members email those outside of their own district).

I have truly respected

I have truly respected 'real' conservatives such as Goldwater, though I am a progressive, liberal Democrat myself. Goldwaters have their views, and I have mine. They often they disagree with one another. I also have liked your website and your effort to outreach. BUT I must say that I am disturbed by your patronizing of Malkin and Drudge. These two people are neither activists nor journalists. Their work history neither displays profound thought nor genuine effort to help GOP.
In the next few weeks I must decide if I really want to visit your website on a daily basis which I do at the moment. From whatever conservative webtalk I see, your's is probably only the 'sane', if you will, website worth hitting.

Well...

I must say that I'm glad you're a reader of TechRepublican and please feel free to stick around and kick your shoes off a bit.

I disagree with your comment about Drudge and Michelle. I think they're both making a serious impact on the discussion and should continue to receive notice in this space as it relates to the tech + politics sphere.

Again, thanks for swinging by. I look forward to your input to the discussion.

From the Mouth of Babes

Note to Others: There is more than one type of Conservative. Goldwater is a favorite to me. I'm not a Ron Paul supporter. There's a common misunderstanding about Conservatism represented everywhere.
Notice to blurred line drawn between Party and an Ideology. It's very unfortunate.

Ali A. Akbar
Blogger
econservative.org, Founder

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Clicky Web Analytics