blog advertising is good for you
Revolution
Slatecard
Eyeblast.TV
Keep That Faith
The Next Right
Real World Republicans
Tech + Politics
David All
The Bivings Report
David Almacy's CapitalGig
Personal Democracy Forum
IPDI Blog
PrezVid
techPresident
e.politics
Ft. Hard Knox
Technology
del.icio.us
Digg
reddit
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Mashable
Technorati
Resources
Blogger
Drupal
Facebook
Feedburner
Flickr
GetClicky
Google Analytics
MediaWiki
Myspace
Newsvine
Political Wire
PollingReport.com
Problogger
Sitemeter
Talkdigger
Typepad
WordPress
YouTube
International
ConservativeHome.com
18 Doughty Street
Malaysia Matters
Sarko
Webcameron
Conservative Blogs
Ace of Spades HQ
BizCentral.org
Patrick Hynes
Betsy's Page
Bill Hobbs
Captain Ed
Cato @ Liberty
ConservaBlogs
Freedom @ Work
Friends of ATR
Glenn Reynolds
GOP Bloggers
Hot Air
Hugh Hewitt
iowahawk
Jim Geraghty
John Hawkins
Kung Fu Quip
LaShawn Barber's Corner
Little Green Footballs
Mark Tapscott
Mary Katharine Ham
Matt Lewis
Michael Barone
Michael Graham
Michelle Malkin
Newsbusters
NZ Bear
Pajamas Media
Patrick Ruffini
Polipundit
Power Line
Real Clear Politics
Redstate
Right Angle
Robert Bluey
Socrates' Academy
Suitably Flip
The Corner
Tom DeLay
Townhall Blog
Wizbang!
Media Bloggers
Marc Ambinder
Chris Cillizza
Stephen Dinan
Danny Glover
Ben Pershing
Jonathan Martin
Eric Pfeiffer
Ben Smith
WIRED
WaPo's The Trail
WSJ's Washington Wire


Don't be daft
Yes, the First amendment to the Constitution guarantees the right to free speech. You are free to expound on any message that strikes your fancy. You are not free to spray paint your message on my house.
You can complain that Google's political ideology may cause them to selectively enforce their stated policy. Any complaints that it is censorship because they won't publish messages that you like are specious. Censorship implies that force is being used to prohibit some entity from distributing their message. Just because Google doesn't allow someone to spray paint a particular message on their house doesn't make it censorship.