blog advertising is good for you
Revolution
Slatecard
Eyeblast.TV
Keep That Faith
The Next Right
Real World Republicans
Tech + Politics
David All
The Bivings Report
David Almacy's CapitalGig
Personal Democracy Forum
IPDI Blog
PrezVid
techPresident
e.politics
Ft. Hard Knox
Technology
del.icio.us
Digg
reddit
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Mashable
Technorati
Resources
Blogger
Drupal
Facebook
Feedburner
Flickr
GetClicky
Google Analytics
MediaWiki
Myspace
Newsvine
Political Wire
PollingReport.com
Problogger
Sitemeter
Talkdigger
Typepad
WordPress
YouTube
International
ConservativeHome.com
18 Doughty Street
Malaysia Matters
Sarko
Webcameron
Conservative Blogs
Ace of Spades HQ
BizCentral.org
Patrick Hynes
Betsy's Page
Bill Hobbs
Captain Ed
Cato @ Liberty
ConservaBlogs
Freedom @ Work
Friends of ATR
Glenn Reynolds
GOP Bloggers
Hot Air
Hugh Hewitt
iowahawk
Jim Geraghty
John Hawkins
Kung Fu Quip
LaShawn Barber's Corner
Little Green Footballs
Mark Tapscott
Mary Katharine Ham
Matt Lewis
Michael Barone
Michael Graham
Michelle Malkin
Newsbusters
NZ Bear
Pajamas Media
Patrick Ruffini
Polipundit
Power Line
Real Clear Politics
Redstate
Right Angle
Robert Bluey
Socrates' Academy
Suitably Flip
The Corner
Tom DeLay
Townhall Blog
Wizbang!
Media Bloggers
Marc Ambinder
Chris Cillizza
Stephen Dinan
Danny Glover
Ben Pershing
Jonathan Martin
Eric Pfeiffer
Ben Smith
WIRED
WaPo's The Trail
WSJ's Washington Wire


You really are too easy on Erick.
His statements are uncalled for. He is not addressing the content of your post. In fact, he ignores it in order to question your motivation. Would you be as cavalier about his statements if was coming from a liberal? He owes you an apology.
It is instructive to note that Erick and Redstate continue to post attacks on Ron Paul supporters and construct rationalizations that are primariy founded on cherry picking comments, ad hominem, and appeal to their own arrogant authority on who is and is not a Republican. At the time of this comment 3 of their 10 "Recommended Diaries" are attacking Ron Paul and Ron Paul supporters. Including this gem:
"A Brief Administrative Note -Okay, we (and by "we" I mean the moderators) have had a lot of fun with the whole YouTube thing when it comes to the moRons. But it's time to take our site back for non-Ron Paul purposes. This means not letting moRon diaries overrun legitimate diaries, etc. Effective immediately, pro-Paul diaries and comments from new users will be summarily deleted, no matter how reasonable, crazy, whatever it is that they might be. It takes us two seconds to hit the delete button on both your diary and your account, moRons. We will be enforcing this policy without exception."
Only Pro-Paul diaries are banned. Not Anti-Paul diaries. It would be funny if it was not so pathetic.
I'll paraphrase here what I wrote on Erick's site -
It is astonishing that the supporters of the only GOP candidate that actually seems to engender passionate support and is pulling brand spanking new registered Republicans into the party are not deemed to be fit to participate on a Republican board.
I know Republicans were able to get this President elected with a minority popular vote once, but it has to at least be close to pull that off. Trust me guys, its easier if you get more votes.
There is some serious self delusion going on in this party, if in fact Erick and RedState truly "represent the conservative blogosphere."
I prefer to believe that Al and Ed are more representative. I guess we'll see.