Killing is bad, therefore we should kill people who kill, except when we do it it isn't bad, it's good. Anybody who stands in our way when we, the good, try to kill the bad, is himself bad - just like the killer. Barack Obama didn't kill anyone, which is good, but he doesn't want us to kill bad people, which is bad. We want to kill bad killers and it is bad when ostensibly "good" people like Barack Obama stand in our way, an act which changes them from good to bad. It is our position, therefore, that as long as any Barack Obama activity foils any effort by the good to kill the bad then Senator Obama himself becomes bad, even if he hasn't personally killed anyone, which by some standards is good, however in the context of the overall picture, is bad. To summarize: killing is bad, except when it's good. Creating obstacles to killing is bad. The safest way to conduct oneself under confusing circumstances such as these is to not kill, but instead to facilitate killing. When faced with the choice to kill or not to kill, the safe bet is not to kill, however when faced with a choice to allow or prevent killing, allowing the killing to take place is the morally righteous choice. This message brought to you by the Republican National Committee.